Skip to main content
NC3Rs: Macaques logo NC3Rs logo

Rhesus macaque

There are six sub-species of rhesus macaques, or Macaca mulatta in latin. They appear on the IUCN Red List of threatened species and have been categorised as ‘Least Concern‘.

Physical characteristics

A rhesus macaques standing with it's tail stiff in an up-right position to display dominance
A rhesus macaques standing with it's tail stiff in an up-right position to display dominance (Credit: Prabal Sarkar)
  • Tail: 21 -23cm.
  • Upper half of body (arms, upper back) - grey brown.
  • Head - typically golden brown on the top and sides.
  • Lower half of body (rump, legs, lower back, tail) - light brown to auburn.
  • Skin - pink, ranging from a light to bright pink.
  • Longer arms and legs in relation to body size than cynomolgus macaques.
  • White underside.
  • Weight: males (7.7 kg), females (5.3kg).
  • Body length: 45-55cm.

(Metrics from Fooden 2000).

Habitat

  • Largest distribution of any nonhuman primate [1].
  • Native to mainland Asia – India, Bhutan, Myanmar, Nepal, Bangladesh, Thailand, Laos, China, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Vietnam.
  • Introduced to Cayo Santiago (Puerto Rico) and in the Silver River State Park (Florida, USA) as free-ranging colonies, both in 1938, and to Morgan Island (South Carolina, USA) in 1979 [2].
  • Habitat ranges from arid, open areas to grasslands, woodlands and mountainous regions up to over 3,000 metres [3].
  • May be either primarily arboreal or terrestrial depending on their habitat [4,5].
  • Forms mixed-species troops with bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata) on the eastern coast of peninsular India.
  • See the IUCN Red List website for a map of the geographical range of this species (excluding introduced populations).

Ecology and behaviour

(Adapted from Jennings & Prescott 2009 and Cawthon Lang 2005)

Ecology Behaviour
Habitat

Varies from hot arid areas to rain forest, areas of seasonal snowfall and urban sites; from sea-level to >3000m
Can be predominantly terrestrial or arboreal, depending on habitat [5]. Locomotion is quadrupedal walking, running and leaping. Vertical escape routes utilised to avoid predators. Good swimmers [6]
Home range

Depends on habitat; from 0.01 to >1600 ha [1,6-8]
Long distances covered when searching for food and water. In areas of human activity, over 90% of the diet can be from human sources, either direct handouts or from agricultural sources [9]
Diet

Omnivorous; consumes fruit, seeds, leaves, plant exudates, bark, grasses, roots, fungi, insects and fish [6,10]
Eclectic diet, but selective. Cheek pouches enable storing of food during foraging. Food is transported away from the foraging site for consumption, often to avoid competition from dominant conspecifics.
Activity patterns

Primarily diurnal
Across all habitat types, feeding and resting are the major activities; the rest of the time is spent in travelling, grooming, playing and other activities [7].
Sleeping behaviour

Roost in groups
Sleep huddled together in elevated positions, e.g. on cliffs or edges of branches to avoid ground-dwelling predators.
Group living

Group sizes range from <10 to >100 individuals; in provisioned populations, can be much larger (e.g. over 300 on Cayo Santiago)
Variable group sizes depending on habitat and ecological conditions. Home ranges overlap and groups have high frequencies of intergroup contact, which is characterized by generally mild social interactions [11]. Multi-male/multi-female groups. Females remain in natal group (philopatry); most males emigrate before they reach sexual maturity.
Social behaviour

Hierarchical
Highly social, hierarchical relationships. Organised around matrilines – mothers, daughters and sisters. Females and males have strict dominance hierarchies. Group cohesion is maintained through allogrooming. Group living necessitates complex social communication skills.

 

References

  1. Southwick CH et al. (1996). Population ecology of rhesus macaques in tropical and temperate habitats in china. In: Evolution and ecology of macaque societies (Eds. Fa JE and Lindburg DG) (pp. 95-105). Cambridge Univ Pr.
  2. Rawlins RG and Kessler MJ (1986). The cayo santiago macaques history, behavior, and biology, 1st edition. State University of New York Press.
  3. Rowe N (1996). The pictorial guide to the living primates. Pogonias Pr.
  4. Seth PK (2000). Habitat, resource utilization, patterns and determinants of behaviour in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Human Ecology 11(1): 1-21.
  5. Seth PK et al. (2001). Indian rhesus macaque: Habitat, ecology and activity patterns of naturally occurring populations. In: Non-human primates of india , envis bulletin: Wildlife & protected areas (Ed., Gupta AK) (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 68-80). Wildl Inst India.

  6. Fooden J (2000). Systematic review of the rhesus macaque, macaca mulatta (zimmermann, 1780) / jack fooden  1 ed. Field Museum of Natural History. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7192

  7. Seth PK and Seth S (1986). Ecology and behaviour of rhesus monkeys in india. In: Primate ecology and conservation (Eds. Else JG and Lee PC) (Vol. 2, pp. 89-104). Cambridge University Press.

  8. Srivastava A and Mohnot SM (2001). Distribution, conservation status and priorities for primates in northeast india. In: Non-human primates of india , envis bulletin: Wildlife & protected areas (Ed., Gupta AK) (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 102-8). Wildl Inst India.

  9. Southwick CH and Farooq Siddiqi M (1994). Primate commensalism : The rhesus monkey in india. Rev Ecol (Terre Vie) 49: 223-31.

  10. Lindburg DG (1971). The rhesus monkey in north india : An ecological and behavioral study. In: Primate behavior: Developments in field and laboratory research (Ed., Rosenblum LA) (Vol. 2, pp. 1-106). Academic Pr.

  11. Melnick DJ et al. (1984). Male migration and inbreeding avoidance in wild rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 7(3): 229-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350070303